|Please welcome guest-blogger, Mr. Walter Lewis.|
“Walter Lewis, a retired lawyer and former columnist
who resides in Lihu'e Hawai'i”
A tragedy of the Obama administration has been its inability to accept that America is under attack by Islamic terrorists This reality disrupts his desired legacy narrative that he kept us out of war but tends to explain his timid response.
A disturbing byproduct has been the failure by the President and many in his party to identify the enemy. He simply refuses to use the term “Islamic terrorists” to describe the threat being made. And
Hillary Clinton muddles the issue by asserting that we are at war with “Islamic radicals” but not with Islam.
|On December 3, 2015|
the N.Y. Post published
this controversial cover.
The Republican nomenclature is also defective. Their customary perhaps politically correct terminology is to refer to “Radical Islamic terrorists” No one has explained the intended meaning of the word “radical” in this context. If the word is used to mean those who support terrorism it is redundant and circumlocutory.
Wouldn't it be better to describe accurately our foe as Islamic terrorists and and set about the task of defeating them?
|With all that's happening in the world|
make sure to make time to watch the sunrise!
Trump calls for 'complete shutdown' on Muslims entering US. Read all about it.
Do you agree or dis-agree?
Hana Hou, (Encore) Shared From Facebook...